In the group Bitcoin Poland ( which is the highest Tier aka most money was spent) most posts are links to Andreas Antonopoulous (? greek names out of memory are hard) youtube legacy! Im happy hes getting all the respect, recognition and exposure he deserves its weird that someone, I just assume its the same person everytime, spend 100k SATs on upvotes.... To get onto the front page 2k is more than enough and since it must be marked as polish it never shows up to many people anyways. Spending 100 000 is 8,4 € by today.... That for every video is some money already. I would prefer seeing this donated to Andreas instead of wasting it ( the community gets it but for what?)
I dont think this needs any regulation by zapread or whatsoever I would just hope the person who spends it thinks about that.
Andreas Antonopoulos, as far as I know, gets paid for performances (I think so). Voting for my entries is of course optional.
I hope that ZapRead will develop, I think how to support him financially here (to make him earn money).
The biggest problem he has (in my opinion) is the lack of programmers. Zelgada spends a lot of time on ZapRead, but of course he has his own things. It's a pity that he chose C# instead of the best PHP :D
___
With time, as the portal expands, more income will go to better creators. At least I hope that to the creators, because I don't know if you know I'm on Steem, and there the money goes to whales, and some pennies fall to the content creators.
Yeah heard of Steem and agree.
Andreas gets paid for some talks but his Q&A is usually only supported by his Patreons so you could argue that he's covered for that too. I think after he made public a few years ago how much he owns he got a lot of donations so he I assume he is financially stable. BUT my main point was why to pay this money here? I get some of the community money for doing nothing but being here. Theres a possibility to tip a person directly if you didnt know then theres no cut for the community.
Thanks for the explanation :)
I understand that and I believe that this is a error in fact. Remember that ZapRead is in Beta 0.2 (almost 0.3) and there will be a lot of improvements and fixes.