I think it's a matter of priorities and impacts.  BTC is working on bigger-picture long term issues, while Bitcoin Cash is a centralized coin (how else can they keep doing hard-forks...), which works on short term improvements which may or may not scale.  the DAA is something done just in BTCH because the coin genesis was a disaster with EDA.  It doesn't mean it's better than what BTC already has - so why should BTC adopt something like that (not that it could without a hard fork).

If anything, BCH is borrowing from BTC in their development.  Stuff like LN, upgraded signatures, etc.  All research and work from BTC.  They are enabling new OPCODES which are a possible risk and bloat vector.  BTC doesn't need to do that.

BTC has issues which are being addressed in the long term, searching for the right solutions.  There is no rush at this time.  I still do not see any BCH feature that we need in BTC.  

If the post is not good - it should be voted back down by the community - the funds from which also go back to the community. It's a game theory approach to regulating the webpage...

But if a post is downvoted because  of unpopular opinion I need to rely on other people paying to get my post again to 0.

In my eyes I wrote a biased comment (towards BTC) about BCH without attacking anyone (maybe words like core or BCH or roger ver are not popular) and recieved bad reputation for a question

Repost to Meme group maybe to keep this group more serious ?

Thanks for this post, didnt know Memo existed, only knew about Yours.org.

A really interesting discussion about the decline in usage on Memo and the reasons, specially this comment:
Maybe because it costs money to speak and most things people say are worthless.

That comment pretty much explains why people wont pay for reading other people posts.

Lets see how ZapRead can do this better.